Här hittar du casinon som är licensierade av internationella spelövervakningsmyndigheter, inte av Spelinspektionen.
| Casino | Transparenspoäng | Regulator and number | Minsta insättning | Uttagstid | Omsättningskrav | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PlayOJO Operator not published | 7.7
/ 10
Transparenspoäng | UK licence licence number not published | $10 | 95% processed within minutes | 0x | E-plånböcker, Kredit- och debetkort |
Slingo Originals (parent company) | 4.2
/ 10
Transparenspoäng | Malta (MGA) licence number not published | £10 | Not published | Not published | Interac |
Operator not published | 4.2
/ 10
Transparenspoäng | Malta (MGA) licence number not published | $10 | Not published | Not published | Interac |
Operator not published | —
We hold too few of this brand's own figures to work out a score. | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Interac, Visa and 4 more |
Esports Entertainment | —
We hold too few of this brand's own figures to work out a score. | Malta (MGA) No. MGA/B2C/522/2018 | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published |
Operator not published | —
We hold too few of this brand's own figures to work out a score. | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Interac |
Nothing matches these filters. Try removing one of them — the deposit limit and the payment method rule out the most.
The list holds 6 casinos. For each one the row shows what the brand publishes on its own pages and nothing else: the regulator that licensed it, the smallest deposit it accepts, how long it says a withdrawal takes, the wagering that comes with its offer and the payment methods it names. Where a brand does not publish something, the cell says so rather than disappearing.
On a phone the row keeps the name, the score, the regulator with its number, the smallest deposit and the payout time; the wagering and the payment methods are on the brand's own card, where nothing is hidden.
The default order is the score. The filters narrow the list by payment method, live tables, stated payout speed and support hours, and the order can be changed to the smallest deposit, to how long the operator has been running, or to how often a brand is searched for — a measurable thing that is not a recommendation.
3 of the 6 brands here carry a score. It counts one thing: how much of what we check the brand puts in writing on its own pages — the regulator and the licence number, the payout time, the three bonus terms, the minimum deposit, the support hours and channels, and the responsible-play tools. Ten points over six lines, and every point comes from a field the brand publishes. An empty field scores nothing and the row says which field it was.
Nobody here has opened an account at these casinos, deposited or timed a withdrawal, so the number is not a measure of how a casino treats a player. A brand that publishes everything can still be a poor place to play, and a brand that publishes little is not thereby bad — it is unread.
3 brands hold too little of their own figures for a score to mean anything — fewer than three of the six lines have anything to read at all. They carry a dash and the reason, not a low number, and they stand at the bottom of the list. How this score is worked out.
4 of the 6 brands name a regulator, and 1 of those give the licence number as well, which is what makes the claim checkable: the number can be looked up in the regulator's own register. 2 brands name none, and their rows say so.
| Regulator | Brands |
|---|---|
| Malta (MGA) | 3 |
| UK licence | 1 |
A licence says who a player can complain to and whose rules the operator agreed to follow. It says nothing about how fast that operator pays, and the regulators above differ widely in what they will do about a complaint. It is the first thing to check and the last thing to rely on.
3 brands publish a minimum deposit. The other 3 do not state a minimum anywhere on their own pages.
Payout time is where the silence is loudest: 0 brands state it in hours, 1 state it in minutes or as instant, 0 describe it in other terms, and 5 give no figure at all. A missing payout window is worth asking support about before depositing, because it is the number a player finds out about last and remembers longest.
1 brands announce a welcome offer, and 0 of them publish the wagering that comes with it. A headline percentage without a wagering figure is not an offer you can price, and the row says when the figure is absent.
The same rule explains the gaps. 0 brands describe their withdrawal limits, 2 list responsible-gambling tools, 2 name the company behind the site, and 2 answer support around the clock. Those counts are lower than the list is long, and that is the honest state of what these operators publish.
A further 543 brands come from a compiled licence directory: the operator and the licence are listed, their own pages have not been read, and so they carry no score and no deposit or bonus terms. By regulator: 461 under the UK Gambling Commission, 23 Malta, 31 Curaçao, 1 Kahnawake and 27 elsewhere.
Reviews here are signed by a name, not an account. No email, no password — pick what you want to be shown as.
Signed as ·
The review is published on the reviews page as you sent it, signed with the name you chose.
Go to reviews