Casino brands with what each publishes about itself: the regulator and licence number, the smallest deposit, the stated payout time, the wagering that comes with the offer and the payment methods. The order follows how much of that a brand puts in writing, and brands with too little of it to work with stand at the bottom with a dash.
| Casino | Transparenspoäng | Regulator and number | Minsta insättning | Uttagstid | Omsättningskrav | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PlayOJO Operator not found | 7.7
/ 10
Transparenspoäng | UK licence licence number not found | $10 | 95% processed within minutes | 0x | E-plånböcker, Debit cards |
Slingo Originals (parent company) | 5.2
/ 10
Transparenspoäng | Malta (MGA) licence number not found | £10 | Not found | 10x the free spins winnings (slots only) | Interac |
Operator not found | 4.2
/ 10
Transparenspoäng | Malta (MGA) licence number not found | $10 | Not found | Not found | Interac |
Esports Entertainment | —
We hold too few of this brand's own figures to work out a score. | Malta (MGA) No. MGA/B2C/522/2018 | Not found | Not found | Not found | Not found |
Operator not found | —
We hold too few of this brand's own figures to work out a score. | Not found | Not found | Not found | Not found | Interac |
Nothing matches these filters. Try removing one of them — the deposit limit and the payment method rule out the most.
Each collection applies one rule to the 145 brands in the rating: a figure or a term we found on the brand's own pages. The number is how many brands match it.
The list holds 5 casinos. For each one the row shows what we found on the brand's own pages and nothing else: the regulator that licensed it, the smallest deposit it accepts, how long it says a withdrawal takes, the wagering that comes with its offer and the payment methods it names. Where we did not find something on the pages we read, the cell says “Not found” rather than disappearing.
On a phone the row keeps the name, the score, the regulator with its number, the smallest deposit and the payout time; the wagering and the payment methods are on the brand's own card, where nothing is hidden.
The default order is the score. The filters narrow the list by payment method, live tables, stated payout speed and support hours, and the order can be changed to the smallest deposit, to how long the operator has been running, or to how often a brand is searched for — a measurable thing that is not a recommendation.
3 of the 5 brands here carry a score. It counts one thing: how much of what we check the brand puts in writing on its own pages — the regulator and the licence number, the payout time, the three bonus terms, the minimum deposit, the support hours and channels, and the responsible-play tools. Ten points over six lines, and every point comes from a field the brand publishes. An empty field scores nothing and the row says which field it was.
Nobody here has opened an account at these casinos, deposited or timed a withdrawal, so the number is not a measure of how a casino treats a player. A brand that publishes everything can still be a poor place to play, and a brand we found little about is not thereby bad — we simply hold less of it.
2 brands hold too little of their own figures for a score to mean anything — fewer than three of the six lines have anything to read at all. They carry a dash and the reason, not a low number, and they stand at the bottom of the list. How this score is worked out.
4 of the 5 brands name a regulator on the pages we read, and 1 print a licence number. A printed number is not always one a reader can look up: the Kahnawake Gaming Commission's register lists operators and their domains, not licence numbers, so for a Kahnawake brand the check is the operator's name and the site's address. For 1 brands we did not find a regulator named, and their rows say “Not found”.
| Regulator | Brands |
|---|---|
| Malta (MGA) | 3 |
| UK licence | 1 |
A licence says who a player can complain to and whose rules the operator agreed to follow. It says nothing about how fast that operator pays, and the regulators above differ widely in what they will do about a complaint. It is the first thing to check and the last thing to rely on.
We found a minimum deposit for 3 brands. For the other 2 we did not find one on the pages we read.
Payout time is where the gaps matter most: 0 brands state it in hours, 1 state it in minutes or as instant, 0 describe it in other terms, and for 4 we did not find a payout time on the pages we read. A missing payout window is worth asking support about before depositing, because it is the number a player finds out about last and remembers longest.
1 brands announce a welcome offer, and for 0 of them we found the wagering that comes with it. A headline percentage without a wagering figure is not an offer you can price, and the row says when we did not find the figure.
The same rule explains the gaps. We found withdrawal limits for 0 brands, responsible-gambling tools for 2, the company behind the site for 2, and support stated around the clock for 1. Those counts are lower than the list is long: they are what we found on the pages we read, not proof that the other brands leave these things out.
A further 450 brands come from a compiled licence directory: the operator and the licence are listed, their own pages have not been read, and so they carry no score and no deposit or bonus terms. By regulator: 381 under the UK Gambling Commission, 19 Malta, 23 Curaçao, 1 Kahnawake and 26 elsewhere.
Reviews here are signed by a name, not an account. No email, no password — pick what you want to be shown as.
Signed as ·
The review is published on the reviews page as you sent it, signed with the name you chose.
Go to reviews