Multi Casino reads what online casinos publish about themselves — the regulator they name and its licence number, the minimum deposit, the stated payout time, bonus wagering, withdrawal limits, support hours — and puts it on one card per casino so it can be compared. Where we did not find a value on the pages we read, the card says so or leaves the line out, and nothing is filled in by guess.
Terms, banking, bonus rules, responsible gambling, «about us». Not the marketing page — the pages where the conditions actually live.
Each card links to the casino's own site at the bottom, so any line on it can be checked against the operator itself instead of being taken on trust. The wording that applies is the one on that site today.
Where we did not find a regulator, a minimum deposit or a payout window on the pages we read, the card says so in as many words; other values we did not find are left off the card, and tables print “Not found”. None of that is a claim about what the brand publishes — only that the value was not on the pages we read. An invented figure is worse than a missing one.
Nobody here has opened an account, deposited or timed a withdrawal at these casinos, so nothing on the site marks how a casino treats a player, and no reader's rating is folded into an average. The number on a card counts something narrower: how much of the six things we check the brand puts in writing on its own pages. That number sets the order of the catalogue, ties are settled by how often a brand is searched for, and brands we hold too little about carry a dash rather than a low score. How this score is worked out.
The score is built to measure disclosure, not how favourable the terms are: a heavy wagering requirement earns the bonus line the same points as a light one. Three lines do look at the figure itself — a payout time in minutes or hours scores above one in days, a smaller minimum deposit above a larger one, and support around the clock above support with set hours. A dash also stands against brands whose entry was first built from pages that were not their own site: their figures have been removed until the official site is read.
Not every section of the site was collected the same way, and the difference matters more than any of the numbers.
| Section | Pages | Where the values come from |
|---|---|---|
| Casino cards | 145 | The brand's own pages — terms, cashier, bonus rules, responsible gambling, the licence line in the footer. 139 of them link to the casino's own site. |
| Licence directory | 450 | A compiled list of licensed brands. Their own pages were not read, so these entries carry an operator and a licence and nothing else. |
| Game pages | 195 | A compiled list of slot titles: studio, type, mechanics and volatility, with a return-to-player figure for 84 of them. Not read from the games themselves. |
| Studio pages | 58 | A compiled directory of game suppliers. The studios' own pages were not read; the count of titles is taken from the game catalogue here. |
So a casino card and a game page are not the same kind of statement. The first is what a company says about itself; the second is a line from a compiled list, and the figure inside the game you open is the one that applies to it. Nothing on this site was re-read on a schedule, and no page records the date a value was read.
No casino pays for a place here. There are no affiliate links on the site: the outgoing-link field is empty for all 145 brands, no placement has been sold, and the order of the list is not for sale. The link to a casino's own site sits at the bottom of its card, carries rel="nofollow" and has no tracking parameters added to it.
If that ever changes, the arrangement will be described at /affiliates/ and marked on every page where such a link appears — not only in the footer.
Nobody signs these pages, because nobody writes them one by one. A card is assembled from what the operator publishes on its own site — the regulator and licence number, the smallest deposit, the payout window it states, what the bonus asks for — and the casino's own site is linked at the bottom of the card. Studio and game pages are assembled from a compiled directory of suppliers and titles.
That is also why a line can be missing. Where we did not find a weekly withdrawal limit on the pages we read, the card has no such line rather than a guessed one — which says nothing about whether the brand has a limit.
This is a reference work about online casino operators. Each entry collects what an operator states publicly about itself — the terms it publishes, the banking pages it maintains, the rules attached to its promotions, the responsible-gambling tools it lists — and puts those statements side by side on one card per casino.
Nobody working on this site has played at the casinos described here. No account was opened, no deposit placed, no withdrawal requested. That sets the limit of what the site can say: it reports what an operator publishes and links to the site it was read on. It cannot tell you what happens after you register.
The catalogue is at /casinos/; welcome offers are collected at /bonuses/.
Values on a casino card are read from pages the operator publishes: terms and conditions, the cashier page, the rules attached to a promotion, the responsible-gambling section, the licensing line in the footer. Where we recorded the page a value came from, the card links to it so the current wording can be checked there.
Two parts of the site come from compiled lists rather than from the operators' or studios' own pages: the licence directory of further brands, and the game and studio pages, including their return-to-player figures. Those pages say so.
This site does not store the sentence each value came from or the date it was read. Where a value matters to a decision, open the operator's own page and read the clause there.
| Field | What it records | Read from |
|---|---|---|
| Licence and operator | The company and licensing body the site names as its own | Footer, licensing page |
| Bonus conditions | Wagering multiplier, maximum bet, maximum cashout and expiry, where stated | Promotion terms |
| Payments | Methods, currencies, stated limits, processing wording | Cashier page |
| Responsible gambling | The tools the operator lists: deposit, loss and session limits, cooling-off, self-exclusion, reality checks | Responsible-gambling page |
| Restrictions | Countries the operator names as restricted | Terms and conditions |
The site gives no stars, no award badges and no editorial shortlist of favourites, and it grades no casino on quality; the shortlist in an account is one a reader keeps for themselves. A quality grade is a compressed summary of experience, and the experience it would summarise does not exist here. The one number on a card is the disclosure score, and what it compresses is our reading of the brand's own pages: six things we check, ten points, every point from a value we found there. It sets the order of the list, and it measures what a brand puts in writing, not how the casino treats a player.
There are no editorial verdicts and no test deposits. The pages under /reviews/ hold reviews sent by readers, published as written and signed with the name each reader chose — one person's account, not a finding of this site.
Explanations of how the mechanics work are kept apart from operator records, in /academy/ and /glossary/, so a definition is never mistaken for a claim about a company.
If we did not find a figure on the pages we read, a table cell says “Not found”, and a card either says so or leaves the line out. That means one thing: the value was not on the operator's pages we read. It does not mean zero, it does not mean none, it does not mean the operator never publishes it, and it is not an accusation.
The alternative would be filling gaps with typical values or a plausible guess. That produces a page which looks complete and is worse to use, because a reader can no longer tell a copied fact from an assumption.
The same rule covers claims about behaviour — how fast withdrawals arrive, how quickly support answers. If an operator states such a thing, it is printed as that operator's statement, never restated as a measurement made here.
The default order in /casinos/ follows the disclosure score, highest first. Where two brands have the same score, the one with the higher search-demand count in our data stands first. Brands we hold too little about to score, and brands whose figures were removed until their official site is read, come after the scored ones with a dash instead of a number.
Neither number is a recommendation. The score counts how much of what we check a brand puts in writing on its own pages, not how well it treats players. Search volume is a count of attention and carries no claim about safety, fairness, or payouts: a name can be searched heavily because it advertises widely, because it launched recently, or because people are looking for a way to close their account.
Sorting by minimum deposit or founding year, and filters by payment method, licence or feature, are there for anyone who wants the list arranged differently. Ordering changes the sequence on screen; it never changes what a record contains.
Figures in a record are the operator's own, quoted from its terms, and they mean what those terms make them mean. Where a term needs unpacking, the unpacking is a definition: a wagering requirement of 40x means the bonus amount must be staked forty times before winnings can be withdrawn, subject to the same document's rules on eligible games and deadlines.
An example makes the arithmetic visible. Take a bonus of 100 in some currency at 40x: 100 × 40 = 4,000 to be staked. Those numbers are invented for the calculation and belong to no operator here.
Questions about these mechanics are answered in /faq/; terms of art are defined once in /glossary/.
The operator's live page wins, always. Terms change: a promotion ends, a limit is revised, a country is added to a restricted list. What applies to your account is the operator's own document, in the wording the operator publishes — not a copy stored elsewhere.
A value here that no longer matches is most likely a page that changed after the card was built.
The practical rule is short: if a clause matters to a decision you are about to make, open the operator's own page and read that clause. Use the record here to know which clause to look for.
Corrections are ordinary maintenance, not complaints. A useful report contains four things:
A report with the fourth item is the quickest to act on, because it shows where the correct value is written.
Send a report through the contacts page. Commercial arrangements, where they exist, are set out at /affiliates/.
Reviews here are signed by a name, not an account. No email, no password — pick what you want to be shown as.
Signed as ·
The review is published on the reviews page as you sent it, signed with the name you chose.
Go to reviews